Social Entrepreneurship

Why Give? Because Your (College Nonprofit Entrepreneur) Friends Asked

Published November 07, 2009 @ 10:22PM PT

For the past week, there has been a great conversation over at Tactical Philanthropy about why people give. As a relatively wonky community, the answers to that question have involved a lot of great theories and a number of acronyms. I believe the single most important answer is that you give because your friends asked. And in the next 10 years, as the number of young people involved with or just a step away from social ventures increases, this is only going to become more important.

In a response to the conversation, Network for Good's Katya Andresen puts the reasons for giving in two big categories: personal return on investment (the feeling of having done good) and social return on investment (a dispassionate analysis of actually having achieved some social objective).

I would argue that most of the $200-some odd dollars of money donated to philanthropic causes by individual American citizens each year are donated with an implicit "outsourcing" of the social return on investment part of the equation.

First, about half of all individual donations go to religious institutions. Many of those dollars end up channeled to other causes, but the logic is largely about the personal return of having contributed to an institution that is important to you, while at the same time trusting that those institutions will use the money for real good.

What's more, you could make an argument that all nonprofit donor pitches more or less come down to making sure that you feel good about your gift, and working their damndest to convince you that they are competent to ensure that social impact, as well.

What's increasingly even important than these two examples of outsourcing the social return on philanthropic investment however, is the ease with which friends can ask one another to support their causes.

At the core of many nonprofit's excitement about online giving is the ability for staff and supporters to harness the rapid communication of social networking technology to customize and disseminate requests for support across wider and wider networks. While the change isn't fully hear yet, it seems to many to be a much more authentic and efficient way to ask for help than to send mailers out to anyone who's even thought of giving before and hoping enough come back with a check to make it all worthwhile.

But there's something else going on that those not recently on college campuses might not realize. More and more, the most talented undergraduates - regardless of discipline - are spending their extracurricular efforts on social change work. More and more of them are volunteering, more and more of them are going abroad, and more and more of them are starting or joining entrepreneurial nonprofits and social ventures.

Why is this? Part of it is about access; the increase in study abroad, for example, is a self-reinforcing cycle in which more opportunities create more alumni create more conversations create more demand. But there's something larger going on as well.

Today's young people have grown up with access to more news - and more connectivity to direct on the ground sources - than ever before. We're hungry to actually do, and less and less content to sit on the sidelines (or if you will, Morgan Stanley summer internships). When today's young people are surveying their options for summers, and the options are getting research grants or volunteer positions with international nonprofits doing compelling work, or wearing a suit to get some guy coffee and learning how to jockey Excel spreadsheets, guess what they're choosing?

The implication is not that every one of those people that has that sort of formative experience is going to start or join a social venture. But almost every young person today knows more people with their own nonprofit organizations than people a few years older. It's just the norm.

If and as that trend continues, it's going to make more and more sense to just support the work of people you know. That sort of giving has not only the personal return on investment discussed above, but a social return on investment that is about investing in the good work of your friends. And that's even before you get to the fact that many will be more likely to trust the "outsourcing" of the social return on investment to people they know and in whom they have confidence.

I've already reached a point (and actually been there for a few years) where 100% - or truth be told, a lot more than 100% - of the money that I can give to charitable organizations can go to groups run by friends. While I certainly have more friends in this space than the average person, I'm not as much of an outlier as you might think.

So here's the challenge. Giving to a friend's organization is an extremely compelling giving service. The threshold that any new organization or giving platform that's trying to wrest my dollars - and in the future, the dollars of most people my age - away is to provide an experience that is so compelling that I actually decide to turn down my friends.

That's not an easy task, but it's not impossible. Being a part of something larger even than my friend relationships can still be compelling, as the case was with Hurricane Katrina relief. Giving in a way that hits a target population that my friends can't access - as Kiva does for many - is another way. But those are the stakes.

(Photo: Left to Right: Saul Garlick, a friend and founder of ThinkImpact with one of his Kenyan partners)

Related Posts

Comments (3)

  1. Gordon Strause

     

    "I believe the single most important answer is that you give because your friends asked."

    Bingo. And this is definitely not true just for young people. Think it's true for everyone (though I do agree with the central thrust of this blog post that young adults tend to have a greater percentage of friends asking).

    It's the central point I try to make to any non-profit trying to think about how to get donations. People give because people they know ask them to do

     

    Posted by Gordon Strause on 11/11/2009 @ 11:25AM PT

  2. Daniel Ben-Horin

    This is a great post.

    I was just at a dinner discussion of philanthropy last night where people spent a lot of time theorizing about why people give. My contribution to the discussion was to offer the word "normative"--meaning that people are largely driven by their generational zeitgeist, not in the sense of following the herd in a sheeplike way (though there's some of that, certainly) but in the sense of breathing the same air and metabolizing it (in social terms) in the same way. Nathaniel's point here, as I read it, is that this zeitgeist has shifted in a very positive way, and in that shift is important information about 'why people give'--certainly about why the most important people give, meaning young people whose giving life will presumably extend over years and increased affluence.

    This perspective suggests specific strategies. One such might be to worry less about widgets and tech solutions and worry more about human networks. I would argue that the people in these networks will come up with all the widgets and tech solutions needed; the key task, I think, is to inspire, support and celebrate the early adoptors, the one who are providing the 'life hack' counterpoint to schlepping coffee and wrangling Excel.

    For those who find this topic of interest, I heartily recommend the book, The Fourth Turning by Strauss and Howe, a really excellent generational theory of history.

    http://www.amazon.com/Fourth-Turning-William-Strauss/dp/0767900464

    Posted by Daniel Ben-Horin on 11/11/2009 @ 11:30AM PT

  3. Nathaniel Whittemore

    Thanks for joining the conversation Daniel!

    I think that you're right to identify this as a zeitgeist shift, and I think it's exactly right to suggest an investment in the people who are proving the viability of something very different.

    Great recommendation on the Fourth Turning. Have you read Upstarts? I haven't but am interested to see if anyone has.

    http://www.amazon.com/Upstarts-Entrepreneurs-Rocking-Business-Success/dp/0071601880/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1250655773&sr

    Posted by Nathaniel Whittemore on 11/11/2009 @ 08:54PM PT

  4. Reply to thread

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Nathaniel Whittemore

Nathaniel is the founder of Assetmap, a San Francisco-based startup that builds web tools to help people better visualize and leverage their social capital. Before that, he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action. If you already have an account click here.

  Cancel