SoCap08 Wisdom Nugget: The hubris of social change

Published October 14, 2008 @ 11:46AM PT

I'm sitting at the "Design in the Developing World" panel with field giants like Tim Brown from IDEO and Paul Polak, and there was a great little recognition a moment ago about the potential for hubris in social change.

Tim Brown shared that IDEO includes anthropologists, psychologists and other people from a social science background on all of their design teams for the precise reason that they don't think in terms of "what's the solution?" He said that "as a designer, my brain goes straight to the solution and I stop listening to the people I'm working for and miss the important details."

This is an insight, and a recognition of the limitations of a perspective of "problem solving," that should impact the way that every individual and organization involved in philanthropy, development and other fields of social change think about their work.

The process matters, details matter, and there's an important irony around the fetishization of adopting "business models for the nonprofit sector." One of the great disagreements that I hear between nonprofits and consultants who are supposed to help them is around "increasing efficiency." Many people with a business background can't understand why a nonprofit would waste resources with broad-based democratic decision making processes when it possesses the expertise to make decisions.

The reality is that stakeholder engagement that treats the "served" as equal partners in the decision-making process is in the very fabric of succesful social benefit creation. It doesn't matter how good your solution seems if no one cares to adopt it. Sometimes, efficiency isn't about reducing the number of people involved; it's about providing new systems to value their input and "get to yes" together.

Share this Post

Comments (1)

Great perspective. And more and more donors who want social change are realizing thier contributions need to go to groups who work with people not for people in creating that change. Thanks for your insights.

Posted by marjorie fine on 10/20/2008 @ 10:58AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by marjorie
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

Comment

Check Spelling

Email me when there are new posts to this thread
Comment Policy

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Nathaniel is the founding Director of the Center for Global Engagement at Northwestern University, which works annually with hundreds of students in dozens of countries around the world through curricular programs and student project incubation.