Selling Your Impact
Published March 16, 2009 @ 08:53AM PT

As wallets contract during the recession and people begin to re-evaluate they make charitable decisions, the conversation about how to measure and demonstrate impact has never been felt more relevant. Field leaders like the Hewlett Foundation's Paul Brest have encouraged a more strategic approach to philanthropy while new organizations like GiveWell have pushed the boundaries on how we evaluate charity.
A few months ago, we were lucky enough to have Mission Measurement founder Jason Saul post a manifesto about social impact assessment on this site titled "Charity's Existential Dilemma: Are We Really Making a Difference?" In it, he wrote:
The biggest mystery lurking in the depths of the nonprofit sector these days is the murky question of measurement: how do we know if charities have an impact? Frankly, with $1 trillion at stake in the nonprofit sector, measurement is a Loch Ness monster that must be slayed. And lately, there seem to be a cavalcade of white knights reporting for duty. Journalists, bloggers, armchair evaluators, foundation CEOs and self-styled philanthropic "analysts" pontificate solipsistically about logic models, theories of change, "Morningstar-like" rating services, sector-wide taxonomies, Zagat-guides and philanthropic "data management systems."..Solving this problem requires a clearer understanding of what we are trying to accomplish with measurement.
One of the things that gets me most excited about Mission Measurement is their common sense, figure-out-what-really-matters-and-simplify approach to the measurement question. I was excited to see that Jason is doing a continuing education program at NYU called "Selling Your Impact." The program will help nonprofit leaders with identify the tools and strategies they need to more successful capture and share information about the value they create.
Click here to learn more about the program and register.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Charity's Existential Dilemma: Are We Really Making a Difference?
-
Top Trends 2009 #6: Measuring Social Impact
-
NYU Conference for Social Entrepreneurship Keynote: Jason Saul, Mission Measurement
Comments (1)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















The Chupacabra is a made up creature of folk lore, akin to the bogeyman - it wanders around at night and sucking the blood and draining the life from its victims, which in that case would make the chupacabra real, because that fits the description of the IRS. An animal was found a year or two ago believed to be the creature, which turned out to be a mange ridden coyote. The animal is a fiction - and joins the ranks of other famous cryptids like Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and responsible government. It's just a fairy tale, no more real than Goldilocks and the 3 bears, so don't put any fast cash into Chupacabra protections measures.
Posted by gayle qe on 09/04/2009 @ 02:18AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.