Harris Wofford: The Corporation for National and Community Service Needs Patrick Corvington
Published October 02, 2009 @ 03:12PM PT
Harris Wofford is a former U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania and was CEO of the Corporation for National and Community Service under President Bill Clinton.
Today President Obama announced his selection of Patrick Corvington to head the Corporation for National and Community Service, a nomination I whole-heartedly applaud. As one who was there when President Kennedy and Sargent Shriver raised high the Service banner, I am enthusiastic about the President’s vision for service and innovation. I believe he has chosen a leader who has the ability and experience to help take national and community service -- and social innovation -- forward in the 21st Century.
To address the issues of our day, the President has called for a new social contract between citizens and their government, asking all Americans for their service and active citizenship. He asked Congress to put on a fast track legislation authorizing a great expansion of opportunities for citizen service by Americans of all ages and walks of life, and in President Obama's first hundred days Congress passed, by extraordinary bi-partisan support, the Edward M Kennedy Serve America Act. It calls for national service to grow from 75,000 annual members to 250,000 by 2017.
The President has assured Americans that he will match this large new commitment with a government that is more innovative, efficient, transparent, and accountable. The Social Innovation Fund, which will be administered by the Corporation, is one of the key new initiatives of the Obama Administration. It has the potential to increase the quality and quantity of community solutions--a quantum leap in programs that work-- and to strengthen the whole nonprofit sector.
Patrick Corvington has leadership and management skills needed as the Corporation for National and Community Service (www.nationalservice.gov) develops and implements ambitious new plans, redefining service in the 21st Century. As a respected leader at the Annie E. Casey Foundation, Patrick has the networks and experience to create a bolder partnership between the public and private sector, working with diverse groups including faith-based and community-based organizations.
Government of the 21st century needs to reflect the President’s call for a new collaborative and results-based approach to problem-solving. Patrick has the vision to see that the Corporation works across silos, sectors, and agencies to build and strategically deploy the human capital necessary to meet pressing social challenges – ushering in a new area of citizen engagement.
To fulfill the promise of the Kennedy Serve America Act, the Corporation needs Patrick Corvington now, so let's join in urging Congress to put his confirmation on another fast track.
Share this Post
Comments (23)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Harris Wofford was a U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania from 1991 to 1995. Since helping to launch the Peace Corps in 1961, Mr. Wofford has been at the forefront of the nation's service movement. He was CEO of the Corporation for National Service under President Bill Clinton and has dedicated much of his life to the goal of making service a common expectation and experience for all Americans.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















Hmmm? I wonder if it's things like:"a new social contract between citizens and their government," and,"ushering in a new area of citizen engagement," that have Republicans calling Obama a socialist. I hate to concede to the opposition, but this does sound a little,"Mein Kampf-ish."
If Americans can't follow our Constitution, what makes people think they will follow,"a new social contract?" What rank will I hold on this,"contract?"
"-based approach to problem-solving." Our Government is top heavy, make it smaller, give the people their power back; problem solved!
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/02/2009 @ 08:45PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I like this idea. We should not have any inhibition because of the extremist elements of the opposition. They will attack the President if he becomes completely like them (Clinton was witch-hunted after he signed the 'welfare-reform' horror and caved in on mcuh else). We need to be about positive change. Saying that fascistic tantuming fringes won't like it is not an argument against new ideas. Rev. Bookburn - Radio Volta
Posted by Rev Bookburn on 10/04/2009 @ 12:08PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Why do frightened people always see Hitler behind every tree?
How is encouraging "the people" to voluntarily serve their country taking their power away? If anything, becoming more engaged doing something constructive could do some good for America.
And yes, I volunteer.
Posted by Claudia Curler on 10/04/2009 @ 02:13PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I volunteer as well, probably more than most people. Although, I don't need a,"Social Contract," to play an active role in my community.BTW, these,"volunteers," will be compensated, which means employed. "The expansion of opportunities for citizen service." You don't need legislation to volunteer.(Yea, but I'm the F*cktard.)
Bringing our,"industrial," middle and lower-class jobs back, would also,"do some good for America." Not Government subsidized employment.
(For the Bill Clinton fan:) America looses 19 billion dollars a year thanks to NAFTA; countless jobs were also lost, when Clinton signed on to this nightmare. So if Obama really wants to create jobs, he could get us out of NAFTA.
"We need to be positive about change."........
The unemployment rate is up, we have the highest deficit in history, we are at war with 3 more countries, and we belong to China...........
"Positive," enough for you Rev? I'm not fascist, I'm realistic. If you can't back-track; figure out where this Country fell off coarse, then you sign the contract.
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/04/2009 @ 08:37PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
To Rev. Bookburn,
Please show where the Constitution grants the authority for any welfare? There is nothing new about authoritarian government. You really want to be "progressive"? Support your Constitution. Or are you afraid to be responsible for yourself?
Posted by dave thomas on 10/05/2009 @ 05:49PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I do not Know about Pat. Corvington? In my learned opinion, Mr. Clinton's administration did nothing Good for the Poor. But I will be writing him and calling his office next week.
Thanks again Change.org for telling activist where the to proper avenue to turn.
This is Part of what I will send to MR Corvingon
As jobs in Maine paying $10 on hour are deemed good jobs, in fact they are not. But it costs $15.51 to cover the rent. This is a bad paying job. Minimum wage should Go up to $19.60 mot $9.20 in 2011
I have not studied the report from the UK. But I agree with at least two points.
1. to eradicate poverty not just reduce numbers should be the goal of everyone.
2 America needs new thinking on this topic.
As what US Senator Ted Kennedy said to the effect of.
"All Americans working for a living should not be in poverty"
Check out the report by going to http://zunia.org/index.php?id=11728&tx_dgcontent_pi1[tt_news]=288589&cHash=26471db123.
Then hitting the report link.
Then: Think about joining some people who will vote to have the voices of poverty heard by looking up Poverty on their search engine, at Yohoo and Google. this Dec. 10. Its Human Rights day
Vote once or 101 times by puttting the word Poverty into the search browser then hitting GO. You are not approving of anything, except America should speak about poverty.
Seek people to themselves vote and to find other who will find others.
How it will work. If we look up just the word Poverty on Yahoo and alternatively Google enough times, his will register the word poverty as a popular Search.
Newspapers editors will have this phemonon pointed out to them by activist like myself. They can no longer saw the public is not interested in poverty if it is a popular search. This could result in news sources carrying the untold stories of poverty.
Hospitality House Inc., will tell news sources that some people voted more than once. But they are voting also for the caring people who due to our lack of income, we cannot design a program which will reach many caring people. We can not reach to get them to vote. But we know they are there.
We only ask for searches. Your searches can improve they way Americans, the world, thinks about 40+ million counted with a Lack of income.
On Dec 10th Search Yahoo and Google for poverty. Get others to do the same. Have the others you find, ask the groups they belong to to do the same.
I pray that change will allow this to appear and might reach another idea or two on getting people interested.
Fighting for Human rights on Human Rights Day
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 10/03/2009 @ 08:04AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jan, this is brilliant and so are you ;)
Posted by Rachel Russell on 10/03/2009 @ 06:08PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I have always felt that young people, male and female, should spend a year doing some community service, either the parks, the hospitals, day care, elderly, the police or army. They would get a living stipend like the Peace Corps or Americorps.
Everybody has too much of a "What's in it for me?" attitude. Some universities give financial credit to students who had volunteered. Switzerland has mandatory military service, and people know that it is part of their plan, like school and college. (switzerland is not Nazi Germany.) To handle the flood of volunteers I would also propose six-month periods for adults at age 35, to volunteer and use their management skills or whatever to serve some aspect of the community. This is also what they do in Switzerland. Obviously many Americans would complain that they couldn't afford to take time away from their career, but I think we could be creative, and it keeps alive a person's awareness of social responsibility.
Posted by Stephen Hoy on 10/05/2009 @ 06:22AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
High schools in my area already do require community service hours/credits to graduate. Why should children be rewarded for this? Shouldn't the feeling of satisfaction, or making a positive difference, be enough?
I'm never going to see how: 250,000 more people employed by our Government, by 2017, equals "community service." Nor will I understand, why you fail to comprehend this.
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/05/2009 @ 08:35AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I went to the website listed and realized this is a really great program that I know little about. This organization provides grants for college students in TX, that volunteer their time to help in many ways, then they get money to help pay off their student loans or funds to help them through college. There are also funds for the elderly that volunteer to help kids by being "adopted like Grand Parents" and mentor children. From what I have read it seems like a very worthwhile program that is helping in many ways across the country. If what I read is correct, I am proud of this program, and all of those who volunteer their time in so many ways to help others. If each one of us just dedicated a couple of hours a week to help kids, the elderly, Meals on Wheels, volunteer at our hospitals, our libraries, all around our own community, we could accomplish the world.
Posted by Pam Steele on 10/04/2009 @ 03:02AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ms. Pam, of coarse giving grants to students and compensating the elderly for their time is wonderful, but someone has to pay for it. The fact that the Capitalist-swine that run this Country, have sent all of our jobs overseas, and NAFTA has allowed them to bankrupt and monopolize the billion dollar ag. industry; leaves little hope for the Republic,"for which we stand." They control the resources; means they control us.
Not everyone is college material, nor do all the elderly have the ability to volunteer. What happens to these people? Social Security? Wel-fare? Shouldn't they have options? Maybe self-employment, or blue-collar jobs? Is America so powerful, the rest of the world should cloth and feed us, while we live in a totalitarian society?
NO! NO, and more....NO! I believe Americans can and will fill these positions, when they become available once again. This is a nothing more than a costly tax-hike/Capitalist takeover.
I don't see Hitler, I see Wall Street. How is it, that all of Obama's constituents refuse to see what is right in front of them? "How fortunate for leader that men do not think,"-that was Hitler
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/04/2009 @ 10:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Dear Rachel
With every ready to point out the flaws of my ideas I do like it when someone calls me brilliant. At another site I was told by a surposingly caring person "To end my own poverty first"
When I told him that his words were degrading he said to the effect of "think of ending my own poverty as a test. A test that I am worthy to ask people to take action this Dec. 10th. " Who made him test master?
Do not get me wrong his comments ended with good results. He made me clarify my writing .I hope. But I usually get what feels like, 25 Nays to every yea. This coming week I will write to Christian aid UK the place that devoted 15 pages of written text to ending all poverty, not just reducing the numbers in poverty.
This is what a bigger group I belong to believe Cure 100% of poverty its the Maine Poor Peoples Economic Human Right Coalition. The bigger Nation group is Poor Peoples Economic Human Right Campaign. http://www.ppehrc.org/ hit National.
If you think its Brilliant will you vote to make poverty in the top 10. Dec. 10th, by using your search engines on Human Rights Day? Am looking for people to both use their own search engines and hit the word poverty, and get many others to do the same.
If everyone gets even 3 other individuals or groups to use their search engine we can be number 10-or 7 or 4.
This is a way to let us poor speak out, and to call for ending all poverty. I can remind you or any interest party a week before the 10th.
I would love for Change.org to join this action.
That is the day on 1948 the UN accepted the 30 human rights, written into the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, into the possibility of being a reality.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 10/04/2009 @ 08:24AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Count me in Jan. I've circled the day on my calendar. This is a well thought out action, hit the button to make positive change instead of the spectre some of us lived through during the Cold War. Put the people in charge!
Posted by Oceania OZ on 10/04/2009 @ 05:25PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thanks you are counted in. You want to tell people about this? Do not have too just if you have time and want to make top ten. I am So Grateful.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 10/06/2009 @ 08:01AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
We need to volunteer and there are so many causes, as change.org is a testament to, that can use our help. Still, it is extremely sad that our nation requires our government provide incentives to do such or that those that do volunteer expect water bottles & t-shirts with their favorite charity's logo scripted across the front or that the government will sink millions into promoting all the right charities in a mass marketing campaign in an attempt to brainwash people into feeling moved to get out there and "Make a difference!".
We claim always to want to do the right thing, and yet, we don't do the right things.
Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 10/05/2009 @ 12:26AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Congress should act on the Corvington nomination. Community service at home and abroad provides the opportunity for many to grow the "giving" part of their souls. It increases the likelihood that in later careers they will see beyond the bottom line dollars and factor in a broader set of values. We will all profit from having more Americans engage in public service.
Posted by Ronald A. Schwarz on 10/05/2009 @ 01:54AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I absolutely agree Ronald but we need to teach volunteering for the sake of volunteering and not volunteering because you get something or because it's the popular thing to do. I never thought you could drain the joy and meaning from volunteering but I see it being done more and more often.
I think volunteering should begin very young and be a family choice in order to become part of the culture of our nation and done with joy and care instead of meeting requirements to get a grant for school or to get some "freebies".
Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 10/05/2009 @ 09:46AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
For my own part, I have no problems volunteering for the benefit of the nation. I did volunteer for military service and received an honorable discharge. However, so long as our government continues to wage political war against it's citizens, I will politely decline. We are supposedly protected from radicals by a separation of church and state. The government continues to legislate 'morality' from a religious stand point with Don't Ask Don't Tell and the Defense of Marriage Act. These are clearly state-sponsored discrimination. Additionally, when nearly 50% of the nation agrees with decriminalization or legalization of marijuana and the government continues it's draconian policies against these citizens, the only conclusion is that our government no longer represents fairness, equality or the will of the people. The Boston Tea Party which sparked the American Revolution was in protest of a tax on tea. We are now subjugated to an income tax of generally 25-30%, have a heathcare system ranked 37th in the world by WHO, an economic disaster and are losing our position as leader of the 'free' world.
We don't have to agree that homosexuality or marijuana use is 'right' or 'moral'. But, we do have the ethical obligation as a nation to agree or disagree peacefully and allow others to practice their beliefs responsibly and without government intrusion into our homes and bedrooms.
When our government shows with actions that it is worthy of support, I will be first in line.
Posted by Fred Frankenberg on 10/05/2009 @ 01:32PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Fred,
If Americans truly believed in our Constitution none of the complaints you have listed would be an issue, as there isn't one that falls under the enumerated powers of the government. Until we lose our fear of freedom, it will only get worse.
Posted by dave thomas on 10/05/2009 @ 05:44PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Dave believing in the Constitution and having it alive and Practiced, are two different things. The Courts no longer provide leniency to regular people trying to bring a case.
In fact Since the mid 1970's people without lawyers are held to a higher degree of complying with Rules of the Court than in practice lawyers are held to abide by. This happen through out the USA.
How can one ENFORCE through Constitutional rights if they cannot bring the matters to court ? If in the name of justice has been replaced with a clear docket We are not free. The Government IS Abusing Its POWER, as Fred points out.
What is the worst thing that could happen if we believe Fred? We would try to Fix a system which is not broken. What is the best thing to believing what Fred said? WE would find more use of our freedoms.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 10/06/2009 @ 07:58AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Fred, very good point. As a gay man, who has a wholehearted belief in service to your community, I also feel, some might consider this selfish, Why should I contribute to a society and government which denies me the ability to marry, express myself openly in the military, or adopt children? Gay individuals are second-class citizens as a result of these discriminatory laws, and until they are reversed, and being homosexual is conducive with government policy, and equality is acheived, can we expect to move forward.
Posted by Gilbert Martinez on 11/08/2009 @ 04:31PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
P.S. Obama isn't even calling it,"A Social Contract,"anymore. He is calling it, "An Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Package."It will cost 7 hundred and 75 billion dollars,(pocket- change, for our debt.) 90% of the jobs that will be created, are in the private sector, and it calls for 40% tax cuts, for Obama's Wall Street buddies; what was that about volunteering again?
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/06/2009 @ 05:04PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010 - H.R.3326
The Senate is expected to conclude work on this $636.3 billion bill funding the Department of Defense during fiscal year 2010."
We should start caring for our own people and country first before spending what we do to police the rest of Earth.
Posted by Claudia Curler on 10/06/2009 @ 05:55PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.