Social Entrepreneurship

From Philanthropy to Business: Shifting Priorities at the Clinton Global Initiative

Published June 25, 2009 @ 11:47AM PT

I think there is a lot of power behind the Clinton Global Initiative. Not so much in just the brand, but in the idea that a commitment made publicly, with a group of others making similar commitments, might be more likely to come to fruition and certainly has a more resonant power.

At the same time though, I've never been a fan of the way they (or other foundations for that matter) clearly demarcate vertical program areas like "global health," and "poverty alleviation." I understand why this particular "specialist" heuristic of philanthropy evolved, but I think it often rubs up against reality in which different problem sub-categories run up against and in fact contribute to one another. My interest in collaboration and horizontal partnerships is largely about structuring approaches to problem solving that get away from the vertical specialist intervention.

I'm really excited to see a slight shift in the approach that CGI will take this year. According to a Reuters article published just a few days ago, there is going to be a broader emphasis this year on how companies can integrate social and environmental impact to improve the bottom line:

"We recognized that the CGI (Clinton Global Initiative) of old was no longer going to be a feasible model to move forward on," said Edward Hughes, CGI's deputy director and director of program for the fifth annual summit this September.

"(Companies) couldn't simply treat us as a place where their foundation would come and write checks to NGOs (nongovernmental organizations), but rather for them to remain engaged, (CGI) had to deliver value to their core bottom line, to their business operations," he said. "We needed to justify this as being a real value-return exercise."

Perhaps even more exciting for me is the new way they're describing their focus areas:

This year, the Clinton Global Initiative will concentrate on four new areas -- harnessing innovation for development, strengthening infrastructure, developing human capital and financing an equitable future.

This seems like an example of what I was writing about in the context of Rwanda yesterday. We have to think systematically and make investments in the infrastructure for good to thrive. I'll be excitedly watching to see whether this year's CGI can help push that conversation.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (1)

  1. Brian Dowling

    Even the UN divides the Millennium Goals into eight separate concerns including end poverty and global health.  While value wise they are all one I do agree with "specialist" heuristic business models for the delivery of service and then arguably also the silo focus on philanthropic efforts.  My personal belief is that having a general everything in the same pot approach would result in tremendous inefficiencies (putting aside all the other existing inherent inefficiencies) There is a definite need for collaboration, horizontal partnerships  re-structuring approaches to problem solving not to get away from the vertical specialist intervention but rise above it.  We have the tools has Nathaniel's blog has persuasively argued in the past.  We need to learn how to use them better.  Let the Clinton Foundation do what it does best and let other Change-agents figure out how to collaborate and get more value-added out of partnerships.

     

    Posted by Brian Dowling on 06/26/2009 @ 09:22AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Nathaniel Whittemore

Nathaniel is the founding Director of the Center for Global Engagement at Northwestern University, which works annually with hundreds of students in dozens of countries around the world through curricular programs and student project incubation.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.