Contrasting Approaches to Changing the World at The Hub
Published July 28, 2009 @ 10:40AM PT

Last night, the Hub Bay Area kicked off their Hub Innovation Series with a panel discussion between Ben Rattray (founder of Change.org), Steve Newcomb (founder of Virgance) and Matt Flannery (founder of Kiva.org). The event's organizers clearly wanted a discussion that moved beyond platitudes and got into the nitty-gritty of how to create change. Neither they nor the packed audience were disappointed.
Each of the companies in question gives average citizens the ability to be a part of change, but each in very different ways. Kiva allows anyone with $25 to become a credit life-line to a low-income entrepreneur. Virgance launches companies focused on sustainability that use positive financial incentives (carrots) to shift economic behavior. Change.org is a network that uses media to aggregate energy and then partners with nonprofits for advocacy and other sorts of campaigns that rely on many, organized voices.
One of the most interesting conversational subtexts underlying the panel was whether carrots or sticks are more effective when it comes to inducing behavior shifts, particularly shifts in major companies. Ben and Steve actually didn't disagree that both were important, but where they place their time and effort clearly highlights a difference in perspective.
Each of them basically believe that business respond to real financial incentives. For Steve and Virgance, they try to help companies that want to be good by delivering more consumers and clients. Their Carrotmob and 1 Block Off The Grid companies are examples of that strategy. Ben suggested yesterday that he thinks that in today's world, the level of brand exposure that companies have in a social media world makes them particularly vulnerable to pressure from well organized activists. What's more, in his estimation, the huge array of consumer product choices makes the importance of brand even greater, and the importance of protecting brand even more valuable to companies.
It was a great conversation about an important topic. What do people out there think: is the carrot or stick more effective in changing corporate behavior?
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
The World's Bravest Thinkers
-
The Hacker Dojo: Community-Centric Working Space
-
Saturday Smarts: Mashable's List of Great Minds in Action
Comments (4)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Here is the corrected link to Hub Bay Area: http://bayarea.the-hub.net/public/
/Elias T
Posted by Elias Tavsan on 07/28/2009 @ 11:40AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hub Bay Area corrected link: http://bayarea.the-hub.net/public/
Posted by Elias Tavsan on 07/28/2009 @ 11:41AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I missed the event but it sounds like it was great!
Having worked in the field and realizing that we want to create change in rural areas (such as Kiva entrepreneurs) I have found that the most important factor is self motivation. Life for this population is so difficult and the level of inertia is so high (as they struggle to survive day after day), that the incentive to change has to come from within. Our 'carrots' and 'sticks' need to relate to them and need to fit in with their cultures/norms. We often miss the mark with our products and services.
Posted by One Million Lights on 07/30/2009 @ 08:12AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I also really enjoyed the event and thought the discussion was great. I personally agree with the carrot approach. Although the stick can certainly be effective, especially now, the carrot fosters a more trusting and sustainable relationship; when both are after mutal benefits. I also posted about the event if interested, http://globalinitiatives.wordpress.com
Posted by emily smith on 07/30/2009 @ 02:55PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.