Social Entrepreneurship

Beyond Good Intentions and Thinking About Systems

Published May 29, 2009 @ 05:37AM PT

Beyond Good Intentions is a series of short films about what works (and what doesn't) in international development by young filmmaker Tori Hogan. Each Wednesday for the past couple months, she's released a new series of the film.

This past week, she released her segment about microfinance. Of all of the segments so far though, this was one where Hogan was nervous about it's reception. From her blog on Social Edge:

I was a little bit nervous for Episode 9 (and this blog entry) to come out because I am well-aware that I am questioning a beloved organization and a highly popular development initiative. However, I feel that I need to be honest about what I witnessed in the field and, most importantly, I need to encourage a meaningful dialogue about the realities of micro-lending. After witnessing micro-lending programs on three different continents, I came to the conclusion that in most cases the poor don’t need loans, they need jobs. From what I saw, micro-lending isn’t pulling the poorest of the poor out of poverty.

Hogan describes the litany of problems that she found with microfinance that made it less successful than she has supposed in lifting people out of poverty. Some of the main culprits included high interest rates, inadequate economic opportunities, a lack of business skills and entrepreneurial talent, over-burdened loan officers, and a lack of financial sustainability.

I definitely commend Tori for being willing to share her perceptions, and I think they resonate largely with what many critics identify as the Achilles heel(s) of microlending as an anti-poverty strategy.

But perhaps what it's instructive of is the danger of sanctifying any one particular type of poverty intervention. Problems like a lack of business skills and inadequate economic opportunities implicate a system of related problems that no one type of program can address on it's own.

At such an early stage in the history of the social enterprise movement (and yes, Jeff Trexler should rightly point out here that if you want to get truly historical, it's not that early), we have the opportunity to think differently about how we design organizations, fund programs, and facilitate horizontal partnerships that address some of these systemic challenges.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (5)

  1. Wendy Leonard

    I think this is right on. It seems that we often operation in a vacuum when it comes to International Development. We ride the wave of one trendy idea until we find a reason that it doesn't work. Then, we completely drop that idea in favor of a new one. The truth is that there are benefits and disadvantages of many different approaches. It seems that taking the strengths of each approach and integrating them into a system that addresses the uniqueness of each community makes the most sense.
    When I first travelled to Rwanda, I was so upset that the larger aid organizations were not asking local Rwandans what they needed. This is the reason that we formed The Ihangane Project. Over time, I've realized that we need both types of organizations. The large aid groups that develop larger 'one size fits all' programs, as well as grassroots organizations that allow the communities to adapt the larger programs to their unique needs.
    Thanks for raising these issues~ this type of dialogue is so important!
    Wendy Leonard, MD, AAHIVS
    The Ihangane Project

    Posted by Wendy Leonard on 05/29/2009 @ 09:32AM PT

  2. Nathaniel Whittemore

    Thanks Wendy, I think your assessment of needing all types is right on!

    Posted by Nathaniel Whittemore on 05/31/2009 @ 12:45PM PT

  3. Reply to thread
  4. Jeff Trexler

    Well, from a historical perspective . . .

    Seriously, spot on.  I've found the Beyond Good Intentions series to be a refreshing corrective to a tendency to view programs as innovative & effective with precious little evidence of either.  The same spirit of sympathetic critique animated my own writing on the social enterprise bubble in "Is Social Enterprise Sustainable?"  Believing that everything we do is wonderful is businesslike in the worst sense.

    Hogan's fear of blowback is something the SE community should note--work remains to be done in creating an atmosphere where critical assessment is perceived as welcome as opposed to a betrayal.

    Posted by Jeff Trexler on 05/29/2009 @ 11:00AM PT

  5. Nathaniel Whittemore

    Agreed Jeff, I think that creating that self-critical atmosphere is going to be key for the success of the field.

    Posted by Nathaniel Whittemore on 05/31/2009 @ 12:45PM PT

  6. Reply to thread
  7. Jeff  Mowatt

    Where it did work was in Russia and it has to do with the  phrase uttered in the video "absence of solid economic  opportunity". Applied in an holistic approach to source potential opportunity, rather than believing that microcredit in it's own right is the solution. The social enterprise which sourced it was itself based on a sustainable "profit for social purpose" model, a business with a primary social objective.

    http://www.p-ced.com/about/history/

    With 10,000 new businesses in a city of 600,000 and a business survival rate of >95% for more than a year, it was so successful, that USAID replicated it in several other cities.

    http://www.p-ced.com/projects/russia/

    Interest rates are cause for concern. though one must hold in mind that loans without colletaral to those, like the farmer in the video. who have limited understanding of finance, demand a high degree of interaction with the borrower.

    It is certainly by no means a panacea, but by the same token not to be dismissed as one of the most powerful components in a toolbox for localised development.

    There are other solutions, which may be more applicable in some circumstances.

      

    Posted by Jeff Mowatt on 05/30/2009 @ 09:19AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Nathaniel Whittemore

Nathaniel is the founding Director of the Center for Global Engagement at Northwestern University, which works annually with hundreds of students in dozens of countries around the world through curricular programs and student project incubation.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.